Avcom losing valuable contributors.

Aviation chatter - For ALL Pilots and Aviation Enthusiasts

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
cage
Niner Tousand
Niner Tousand
Posts: 9450
Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2013 9:47 am
Closest Airfield: FAGC
Location: ..for the grass 35
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 77 times

Re: Avcom losing valuable contributors.

Unread post by cage » Sat Feb 09, 2019 1:20 pm

SlowApproach wrote:
Sat Feb 09, 2019 1:07 pm
I'm curious now: Exactly how many "valuable contributors" have been "lost"?
Depends how you measure or define valuable?
Your experience is similar to others.
I don't think many airline pilots are active any longer.
Certainly those I know that don't take part, view the site as being (going to paraphrase here, not my words) dominated by drivel from weekend warriors.
Avcom is a site mainly used by present and former recreational pilots/enthusiasts (a bit of an assumption on my part, so happy to be shown I'm incorrect), and that is possibly a bigger turn off for current experienced contributors than anyone's account name.
There also has been a lot of politically/racially charged commentary over the years, though thanks to the mods effort has been put back into its little box.
Others have gone the way of being banned for various reasons, which is unfortunate, but when you are a guest in someone else's home dictating the rules won't sit well.
Last edited by cage on Sat Feb 09, 2019 1:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
JSB
ATC Delay
Posts: 122
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:31 am
Closest Airfield: FAGC
Location: Sandton
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Avcom losing valuable contributors.

Unread post by JSB » Sat Feb 09, 2019 1:21 pm

I just related my experience, and like Calle have learnt to survive flying all kinds of weather for more than 20 years. But if I dare say something against the grain, I get blasted. So I'll just keep my tales to myself - out of here...
[/quote]

Excellent idea, please do.
User avatar
jimdavis
10000 and still climbing
10000 and still climbing
Posts: 15450
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2008 7:46 am
Closest Airfield: FAGG
Location: Wilderness
Has liked: 102 times
Been liked: 110 times

Re: Avcom losing valuable contributors.

Unread post by jimdavis » Sat Feb 09, 2019 1:23 pm

jimdavis wrote:
Fri Feb 08, 2019 5:37 pm

Karl, I do apologise if I was rude or disrespectful. I don't remember the discussion, but I do remember having strong feelings about something you posted. Sincere apologise Karl.

jim
Iceberg wrote:
Sat Feb 09, 2019 12:30 pm
The discussion was about flying into thunderstorms. Your reaction just killed the discussion for me. Once the aviation Gods start pounding you, any reasonable discussion goes out the window.
Good afternoon Karl. I am really surprised at your reaction. I have just had a look at our discussion on thunderstorms.

I was neither rude nor disrespectful, but out of respect I apologised (above) just in case I had been.

I agree that I put my case for avoiding thunderstorms forcefully. Why not? I do feel strongly about it. But at no time was I personal, rude or disrespectful. There was plenty of space for an interesting discussion on it if you had chosen to go down that road.

jim
"PPL Manual"
"Flight Tests"
"So Others May Live"
"Flying in Africa" Vol 1
"Flying in Africa" Vol 2
Look inside these books, or buy them at: www.jimdavis.co.za.
Volo
1k poster
1k poster
Posts: 1400
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 12:39 pm
Closest Airfield: FAOR
Location: Kempton Park
Has liked: 8 times
Been liked: 13 times

Re: Avcom losing valuable contributors.

Unread post by Volo » Sat Feb 09, 2019 1:24 pm

I have a notion that there is this growing perception that this forum is broken .
I don't think it is . To my mind its doing what it set out to do in that its offering free speech and diverse opinion and why would we want to put rules in place that would take that away . Sure we are going to see some muddled opinion from time to time and even personal attacks that can be dealt with by the mods - so what ?
Please keep it going as all in all it has proved to be a very informative , entertaining and educating platform and yes there is a need for both pseudonyms and real names for the reasons stated by previous posters . If you are an individual whose identity would not cause any professional embarrassment, then by all means use your real name . You may even want the forum members to know your identity for a variety of reasons .
my 2c worth - Dave Mortimer
User avatar
SlowApproach
Too Tousand
Too Tousand
Posts: 2595
Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 11:01 pm
Closest Airfield: FAGC
Location: Arse-end of Centurion
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 6 times

Re: Avcom losing valuable contributors.

Unread post by SlowApproach » Sat Feb 09, 2019 1:34 pm

cage wrote:
Sat Feb 09, 2019 1:20 pm
Depends how you measure or define valuable?
That's what I'd like to know too :wink:
(Just trying to make sense of the thread title)
Behind every angry woman is a man who has absolutely no idea what he did wrong.
User avatar
Jack Welles
Too Tousand
Too Tousand
Posts: 2764
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2013 1:15 pm
Closest Airfield: FACT
Location: Muizenberg
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 34 times

Re: Avcom losing valuable contributors.

Unread post by Jack Welles » Sat Feb 09, 2019 2:32 pm

SlowApproach wrote:
Sat Feb 09, 2019 1:34 pm
cage wrote:
Sat Feb 09, 2019 1:20 pm
Depends how you measure or define valuable?
That's what I'd like to know too :wink:
(Just trying to make sense of the thread title)
:-k It seems as though some of those that support this notion define it as the people that they agree with or who agree with them.

Ergo, the people who don't agree with them are clearly less valuable :lol:
Jack Welles (thriller_author pen name)
https://www.amazon.com/Jack-Welles/e/B073VJQTTX
Eddie Haynes-Smart
Textbook - "The Lore of Negotiation"
http://www.loreofnegotiation.com
Fransw
Fower Tousand
Fower Tousand
Posts: 4627
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2015 3:22 pm
Closest Airfield: Pretoria
Location: Pretoria
Has liked: 50 times
Been liked: 19 times

Re: Avcom losing valuable contributors.

Unread post by Fransw » Sat Feb 09, 2019 3:33 pm

"Ask not what your forum can do for you, but what you can do for your forum!" - Oom Sama Bin Laden 1803
OG
Frequent AvComer
Posts: 600
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 1:05 pm
Closest Airfield: FAPS
Location: Potchefstroom
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 14 times

Re: Avcom losing valuable contributors.

Unread post by OG » Sat Feb 09, 2019 7:20 pm

This is like the bar at the local gliding club (few flying clubs have bars remaining😉). We go there to be in the company of likeminded people, or to have our weekly fix of amber liquid. Sometimes the conversation is good, sometimes its boring and sometimes its heated. But in the end, those with the passion will be back, even if they just lurk on the fringe. And the << moderated - language>> will be wheeled out eventually.
Oscar Goudriaan - or just OG, which is my contest number when I glide
I'd rather be soaring
User avatar
87Juliet
Fower Tousand
Fower Tousand
Posts: 4537
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 7:53 pm
Closest Airfield: FACT FASH
Location: Stellenbosch
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 1 time

Re: Avcom losing valuable contributors.

Unread post by 87Juliet » Sat Feb 09, 2019 8:14 pm

cage wrote:
Sat Feb 09, 2019 12:47 pm

-I am no less full of <<moderated - language>> in person than I am online (though less misinterpreted in person)
I’ll gladly confirm this statement SirCage...

My name, phone number and place of work in my signature...

So my 2c, in this day and age there is this increasing idea that it’s critical to HAVE to say “something”, even if it’s waffle... personally I was taught that if I didn’t have anything meaningful to say or contribute to a conversation then I should shut my mouth and listen and perhaps I could learn something.

My instruction manual for life states in Proverbs 10:19 “When words are many, transgression is not absent, but he who restrains his lips is wise”.

As for the OP... #lipszipped
Jacques Taljard: Zero-Ate-Two Niner-4-Wun Seven-Zero-Sex-Two
Jaguar Land Rover Stellenbosch
User avatar
jimdavis
10000 and still climbing
10000 and still climbing
Posts: 15450
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2008 7:46 am
Closest Airfield: FAGG
Location: Wilderness
Has liked: 102 times
Been liked: 110 times

Re: Avcom losing valuable contributors.

Unread post by jimdavis » Sat Feb 09, 2019 8:35 pm

OG wrote:
Sat Feb 09, 2019 7:20 pm
This is like the bar at the local gliding club (few flying clubs have bars remaining😉). We go there to be in the company of likeminded people, or to have our weekly fix of amber liquid. Sometimes the conversation is good, sometimes its boring and sometimes its heated. But in the end, those with the passion will be back, even if they just lurk on the fringe. And the << moderated - language>> will be wheeled out eventually.
Oscar Goudriaan - or just OG, which is my contest number when I glide
Thanks Oscar, good to know your name, and that's a very interesting post.

I have been giving this whole Avcom thing serious thought. I originally imagined it would be like a big flying club pub - but it simply isn't. You would very quickly get bored in a pub where 90% of the members had bags over their heads and insisted on being called "X". They won't tell you what they are doing in aviation, or where they work, or where they live, or if they have a family, or any interests and hobbies. I am afraid that this is the state of the Avcom pub.

So why do we bother at all? I pretty much only click with people who have names and hobbies etc. I deplore sarcasm, snide remarks, bragging, and rude or disrespectful behaviour. All of which seem to be on the increase.

So I have to admit that my interest in Avcom is confined to hearing from the 10% who are not in hiding. I also like trying to find out why accidents happen, trying to guide newer pilots away from accidents, and getting involved question and answer sessions. I have learned a hell of a lot about all sorts of things. We are lucky to have members who are specialists in a huge variety of aviation fields - many of which I know very little about. I find Avcom is a wonderful source of information - and I am always amazed how almost any question eventually gets a sensible answer.

Perhaps alongs the most valuable contributors are those who spark interesting discussions by asking questions. I just love people who ask questions. They show a healthy willingness to learn, rather than a know-it-all attitude.

At a dinner party, ask why the sky is blue. You will get all sorts of half-baked replies. The most sensible one is "I don't know - let's find out". This is the part of Avcom that I love.

jim
"PPL Manual"
"Flight Tests"
"So Others May Live"
"Flying in Africa" Vol 1
"Flying in Africa" Vol 2
Look inside these books, or buy them at: www.jimdavis.co.za.
OG
Frequent AvComer
Posts: 600
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 1:05 pm
Closest Airfield: FAPS
Location: Potchefstroom
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 14 times

Re: Avcom losing valuable contributors.

Unread post by OG » Sat Feb 09, 2019 9:45 pm

I agree Jim, but also subscribe to live and let live. Sometimes its more important to be happy than to be right
I'd rather be soaring
User avatar
Iceberg
Too Tousand
Too Tousand
Posts: 2458
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 1:09 pm
Closest Airfield: FAWB
Location: Pretoria
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 4 times

Re: Avcom losing valuable contributors.

Unread post by Iceberg » Sun Feb 10, 2019 11:32 am

jimdavis wrote:
Sat Feb 09, 2019 1:23 pm
jimdavis wrote:
Fri Feb 08, 2019 5:37 pm

Karl, I do apologise if I was rude or disrespectful. I don't remember the discussion, but I do remember having strong feelings about something you posted. Sincere apologise Karl.

jim
Iceberg wrote:
Sat Feb 09, 2019 12:30 pm
The discussion was about flying into thunderstorms. Your reaction just killed the discussion for me. Once the aviation Gods start pounding you, any reasonable discussion goes out the window.
Good afternoon Karl. I am really surprised at your reaction. I have just had a look at our discussion on thunderstorms.

I was neither rude nor disrespectful, but out of respect I apologised (above) just in case I had been.

I agree that I put my case for avoiding thunderstorms forcefully. Why not? I do feel strongly about it. But at no time was I personal, rude or disrespectful. There was plenty of space for an interesting discussion on it if you had chosen to go down that road.

jim
Hi Jim

No apology was neccessary. I agree with you on the subject - my post in facts states in capital letters what I think of flying into storms.
But the tone of the thread was , like Calle also mentioned, "stay out of TS's - no further discussion". The fact is in real flying there is no black or white when it comes to weather. Do I fly through building cumulus, towering cumulus? What if I inadvertently end up in a storm, be it from being ignorant, stubborn or through lack of planning?

We have had discussions about what to do if you inadvertently end up flying VFR into IF. Here we all agree - don't do it, like with TS's. Yet you had interesting ideas of trimming for best glide and folding your arms to stay alive. Why could we not have a similar discussion about storms. What can we manage and what not, and how to get out if you have transgressed, for whatever reason.

Cheers

Karl
The sky is not the limit....
ZS-MDK
Karl Eschberger
User avatar
jimdavis
10000 and still climbing
10000 and still climbing
Posts: 15450
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2008 7:46 am
Closest Airfield: FAGG
Location: Wilderness
Has liked: 102 times
Been liked: 110 times

Re: Avcom losing valuable contributors.

Unread post by jimdavis » Sun Feb 10, 2019 12:47 pm

Thanks for clearing that up Karl. I am with you 100%. You were seeing it as two issues:

1. The wisdom (or lack thereof) of deliberately entering a thunderstorm.
2. How to handle the situation if you enter one accidentally.

I was only looking at the first.

Never having flown into one, I can only repeat stuff that I have read. I think it basically boils down to three things:

* Get your seat belt and shoulder harnesses as tight as possible.
* Gently turn for the shortest way out. But this goes against the advice to keep the wings level.
* Don't chase airspeed or altitude - simply try to maintain a level nose attitude.

Ernest Gann recommend lowering your seat and turning up cockpit lighting to max, to reduce the effects of lightening blindness. Also, turning off the auto-pilot and turning on all anti-icing equipment.

Im sure we would all love to hear more advice from folks who have been there and done that.

jim
"PPL Manual"
"Flight Tests"
"So Others May Live"
"Flying in Africa" Vol 1
"Flying in Africa" Vol 2
Look inside these books, or buy them at: www.jimdavis.co.za.
Fransw
Fower Tousand
Fower Tousand
Posts: 4627
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2015 3:22 pm
Closest Airfield: Pretoria
Location: Pretoria
Has liked: 50 times
Been liked: 19 times

Re: Avcom losing valuable contributors.

Unread post by Fransw » Sun Feb 10, 2019 1:44 pm

87Juliet wrote:
Sat Feb 09, 2019 8:14 pm
cage wrote:
Sat Feb 09, 2019 12:47 pm

-I am no less full of <<moderated - language>> in person than I am online (though less misinterpreted in person)
I’ll gladly confirm this statement SirCage...

My name, phone number and place of work in my signature...

So my 2c, in this day and age there is this increasing idea that it’s critical to HAVE to say “something”, even if it’s waffle... personally I was taught that if I didn’t have anything meaningful to say or contribute to a conversation then I should shut my mouth and listen and perhaps I could learn something.

My instruction manual for life states in Proverbs 10:19 “When words are many, transgression is not absent, but he who restrains his lips is wise”.

As for the OP... #lipszipped
Are you working towards your next deal with "sirCage" 87? :lol: :oops:
Clinton01
Lining Up
Posts: 114
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 11:42 am
Closest Airfield: Krugersdorp
Location: Johannesburg
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 4 times

Re: Avcom losing valuable contributors.

Unread post by Clinton01 » Sun Feb 10, 2019 1:57 pm

OG wrote:
Sat Feb 09, 2019 7:20 pm
Oscar Goudriaan - or just OG, which is my contest number when I glide
Totally off the topic - but I am curious. How many different gliders have you had with the contest number OG?

C2. Clinton

Return to “General Aviation Chatter”