They needed our Santjie initialy

Moderator: Moderators
Earlier post mentioned one occupant visible in wreckage...any ID..PIC or pax?Jack Welles wrote: ↑Wed Feb 06, 2019 7:31 pmAs a matter of interest Nantes (who sold Sala to Cardiff) are suing the Welsh club for the first instalment of the sale price. AFAIK they are now arguing as to who he belonged to when the aerie went down.
Although the aircraft has been located they haven't recovered the body yet![]()
That's exactly what it was: A contract of sale, which would have stipulated payment time-frames. If a payment was missed and the seller did nothing, it could be taken as tacit approval of the non-payment and make it more difficult to claim it back later.Wonko the Sane wrote: ↑Thu Feb 07, 2019 8:10 amSad that the poor guy has not even been found and money is already taking front stage...like the guy is some piece of goods... disgusting...
I hate to put it this way, because now I disgust myself... So the mercantile law proceed even if the "goods"Deanw wrote: ↑Thu Feb 07, 2019 8:56 amThat's exactly what it was: A contract of sale, which would have stipulated payment time-frames. If a payment was missed and the seller did nothing, it could be taken as tacit approval of the non-payment and make it more difficult to claim it back later.Wonko the Sane wrote: ↑Thu Feb 07, 2019 8:10 amSad that the poor guy has not even been found and money is already taking front stage...like the guy is some piece of goods... disgusting...
The timing may not have been the best, but it was a commercial contract and the legal process in mercantile law proceeds independently.
Deanw wrote: ↑Thu Feb 07, 2019 9:58 amSame issues happen should a house burn down down after the sale agreement has been signed, but prior to transfer at the Deeds Office. Look to the contract to determine when transfer of risk took place. Generally, it is the purchaser that is still responsible, unless the seller failed to take reasonable steps to protect the house.
In this case, the transport arrangements were not made by the seller, but I'm sure all sorts of legal arguments and suits will now be filed.![]()
You can't insure an asset that isn't yours. In the case of property it is on transfer, occupation prior to that is a rental with the seller responsible for the costs (rates, taxes etc) excluding consumables (water and electricity).Deanw wrote: ↑Thu Feb 07, 2019 9:58 amSame issues happen should a house burn down down after the sale agreement has been signed, but prior to transfer at the Deeds Office. Look to the contract to determine when transfer of risk took place. Generally, it is the purchaser that is still responsible, unless the seller failed to take reasonable steps to protect the house.
In this case, the transport arrangements were not made by the seller, but I'm sure all sorts of legal arguments and suits will now be filed.![]()
The contract should stipulate when the change of ownership would occur which probably would be a specific date. From what is stated in the articles he had already assumed residence the new club so they will be liable.cage wrote: ↑Thu Feb 07, 2019 12:01 pmYou can't insure an asset that isn't yours. In the case of property it is on transfer, occupation prior to that is a rental with the seller responsible for the costs (rates, taxes etc) excluding consumables (water and electricity).Deanw wrote: ↑Thu Feb 07, 2019 9:58 amSame issues happen should a house burn down down after the sale agreement has been signed, but prior to transfer at the Deeds Office. Look to the contract to determine when transfer of risk took place. Generally, it is the purchaser that is still responsible, unless the seller failed to take reasonable steps to protect the house.
In this case, the transport arrangements were not made by the seller, but I'm sure all sorts of legal arguments and suits will now be filed.![]()
It should be no different here, he had either started at the club and was on official duty or not.
When there is a lot of money at stake the lawyers will always come out.
You sure about that? I insure my business partner and he insures me.cage wrote: ↑Thu Feb 07, 2019 12:01 pmYou can't insure an asset that isn't yours. In the case of property it is on transfer, occupation prior to that is a rental with the seller responsible for the costs (rates, taxes etc) excluding consumables (water and electricity).Deanw wrote: ↑Thu Feb 07, 2019 9:58 amSame issues happen should a house burn down down after the sale agreement has been signed, but prior to transfer at the Deeds Office. Look to the contract to determine when transfer of risk took place. Generally, it is the purchaser that is still responsible, unless the seller failed to take reasonable steps to protect the house.
In this case, the transport arrangements were not made by the seller, but I'm sure all sorts of legal arguments and suits will now be filed.![]()
It should be no different here, he had either started at the club and was on official duty or not.
When there is a lot of money at stake the lawyers will always come out.
I can insure crew that work for me on film shoots, they are freelance. I can insure third party risks. This guy didn't just 'pass by'
Correct. The law states that there must be an insurable interest. That's why key-man insurance works. If the insured person shuffles off this mortal coil it could cost money to replace him or her.
You're missing the point.