It is sometimes difficult to keep track of conflicting points of view and arguments.
We have had similar people being vitriolic about RT who in other safety posts have said it's see and avoid and RT is optional - so which is it?
People get upset with caustic content when it disagrees, but then become caustic because they are "passionate" about the topic.
wrt point 2 - let's use the word allegedly.
At no point has anyone condoned the behaviour but I have raised the question about who has not (as irresponsible as it may be) erred with RT? (this style of debate has also been used by members in other threads to suit their point, so why not here?)
When it comes to perspective, it is not making it out like the world is about to end and that the non-conformists should be shot in front of the family.
Educate, mentor, be constructive - thumbs up.
Shouting fire and brimstone from the pulpit isn't going to change hearts and minds but will get plenty of thumbs up from the congregation.